Triggers, clinical manifestations and assessment of paediatric fixed drug eruptions: A systematic review of the literature.

Fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a cutaneous drug reaction characterised by recurrent skin lesions occurring at the same site after each exposure to a causative agent. There is currently limited evidence in the paediatric population. The objective of this systematic review is to investigate the clinical features, causative agents and management of paediatric FDE. A systematic search of the English and French literature on paediatric FDE was conducted using the Medline and Embase databases. After full-text article review, 92 articles were included, representing a total of 233 patients. Antibiotics were the most frequent triggering agents, mainly sulfonamides (65.0% of antibiotics). Systemic symptoms were rare, and most patients only received supportive therapy. One hundred and six patients (106) performed a test to confirm the causative agent. Of these, 72.6% had oral provocation tests (OPTs) and 28.3% had patch tests. The patient's age, presence of bullous lesions and mucosal lesions were similar between tested and untested patients. It did not seem to influence the decision to perform OPTs. Paediatric FDE is a non-severe skin drug reaction. Antibiotics were the most reported triggering agents. Drug testing, including oral provocation test, was safely performed in the paediatric population.

An Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Acneiform Eruptions in Patients on Monoclonal Antibody Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors.

Acneiform eruptions occur frequently and early in patients on epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi). Identification of baseline patient risk factors would prompt earlier referral to dermatology to optimize prevention and management. The primary objective of this retrospective study is to determine the association between clinical and demographic characteristics and the development of acneiform eruptions. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with colon and head and neck cancers who started EGFRi between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were followed until death or September 2022. Baseline demographic and clinical parameters were documented and patients were followed from the time of diagnosis to most recent visit for the development and management of an acneiform eruption. Regression analyses were performed to determine the association between baseline characteristics and the development of acneiform eruptions. A total of 66 patients were treated with cetuximab or panitumumab between 2017-2021 were included in the analysis. Forty-seven of the sixty-six patients developed an acneiform eruption while on EGFRi therapy (71.2%). Combination cancer therapy with another chemotherapeutic agent was associated with a lower risk of acneiform eruption (OR 0.03, P = .027). No other baseline features were statistically associated with a lower risk of acneiform eruption. Acneiform eruptions are a common cutaneous adverse event of EGFRi therapy. Ongoing research is required to elucidate risk factors for the development of acneiform eruptions, to improve the quality of life of oncology patients.

Malignancy-associated generalised exfoliative dermatitis: A retrospective study in a single-centre Asian cohort.

BACKGROUND: Erythroderma is an inflammatory skin condition that causes extensive erythema and skin scaling amounting ≥90% of the body surface area. This retrospective cohort study describes the prevalence of malignancy-associated erythroderma in a single centre where there was concerted effort to systematically offer malignancy screens to all adult erythroderma patients above the age of 65 years. METHODS: Clinical charts were reviewed for all adult inpatients and outpatients with erythroderma who attended the National University Hospital (NUH) from 1 July 2019 to 31 December 2021. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical findings, laboratory investigations, disease-specific investigations such as endoscopic procedures and biopsies, follow-up duration and mortality data. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were analysed. The median age of the patients was 73 years old (interquartile range: 59-81 years old). An underlying dermatosis was the most common cause of erythroderma-63 patients having atopic dermatitis/asteatotic eczema or psoriasis. Three patients had erythroderma from drug eruptions, and 1 patient had chronic actinic dermatitis. Four patients had associated malignancies (5.4%). Half of our patients completed further evaluation for malignancy (52.7%). The rest had either declined or were eventually unable to complete the investigations. There was a higher prevalence of associated malignancy (7.8%) in elderly patients above 65 years old. CONCLUSION: When compared to existing literature, our cohort reflects a higher observed occurrence of malignancy in association with erythroderma. As delays in evaluation for underlying malignancy could result in potentially deleterious outcomes, it is prudent to consider systematic screening for malignancy in high-risk populations such as elderly erythroderma patients.

An Observational Study of Fixed Drug Eruption in A Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh.

Fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a distinctive pattern of cutaneous adverse drug reaction. Characteristically the eruption recurs at the same site on re exposure to the offending agent. Aim of this study was to evaluate and identification of the various offending drugs causing FDE which may help the physician to limit the associate complication regarding the drug. This observational cross sectional study was conducted from 1st June 2021 to 31st May 2022 in the department of Dermatology & Venereology of Mymensingh Medical College Hospital after taking approval from institutional ethical committee. A detailed history with clinical evaluation were done for all patients with FDE and thereby recorded in a pre designed proforma. Analysis of data was done using Microsoft Excel 2010 Spread sheet. Out of 65 cases 36(55.38%) were male and 29(44.6%) were female. Majority of cases were found in the age group of 31 to 40 years. The most common group of drug causing FDE was NSAID (52.31%) followed by antimicrobials (44.61%) and anti epileptics (3.07%). Ibuprofen (20.0%) was the most common offending drug followed by doxycycline (18.46%), diclofenac and fluconazole (13.84%), naproxen (9.23%), ciprofloxacin (7.69%), paracetamol (6.15%), metronidazole (4.61%), carbamazepine (3.07%) and aspirin (3.07%) respectively. Extremities (43.07%) were the most frequently involved site followed by trunk (29.23%) and face (10.77%). Generalized FDE found in 16.92% cases. Although FDE are very common the offending drugs show some regional variation as a result of changing trends of pharmacotherapy.

Cutaneous lichenoid drug eruptions: A narrative review evaluating demographics, clinical features and culprit medications.

Cutaneous lichenoid drug eruptions (LDE) are adverse drug reactions (ADR) characterized by symmetric, erythematous, violaceous papules reminiscent but rarely fully characteristic of lichen planus (LP). We aimed to analyse the literature describing cases of LDE within the last 20 years to provide additional insight into culprit drugs, typical latency to onset of the eruption, the spectrum of clinical presentations, severity and management. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE between January 2000 and 27 January 2021. The keywords 'lichenoid drug rash' and 'lichenoid drug eruption' were used. Cases were included if LDE diagnosis was made, and culprit drugs were identified. A total of 323 cases with LDE were identified from 163 published case reports and studies. The mean patient age was 58.5 years (1 month to 92 years), and 135 patients (41.8%) were female. Checkpoint inhibitors (CKI) were the most frequently reported culprit drugs (136 cases; 42.1%), followed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (39 cases; 12.0%) and anti-TNF-α-monoclonal antibodies (13 cases; 4.0%). The latency between initiation of the drug and manifestation was 15.7 weeks (range: 0.1-208 weeks). After discontinuing the culprit drug, the median time to resolution was 14.2 weeks (range: 0.71-416 weeks). One hundred thirty-six patients (42.1%) were treated with topical, and 54 patients (16.7%) with systemic glucocorticoids. Overall, we conclude that, albeit rare, LDE is challenging to diagnose ADR induced by mostly CKI, TKI, and biologics. Treatment modalities resemble that of lichen planus, and the culprit drugs had to be discontinued in only 26%, which is low compared with other types of adverse drug reactions. This is probably due to the low risk of aggravation (e.g. toxic epidermal necrolysis) if the drug is continued and the benefit/risk ratio favouring the drug, as is often the case in cancer therapy.

Spectrum of Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Amivantamab Use.

This case series describes the different dermatologic adverse events that patients experienced while using amivantamab.

Pharmacovigilance of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in associations with drugs and medical conditions: a retrospective study of hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous adverse drug reaction (CADR) is a common problem in clinical medication. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between clinical drug application and CADR occurrence as evidence for preventive strategies and rational clinical drug use. METHODS: We analyzed the characteristics of CADRs of 858 patients admitted to Shandong Provincial Third Hospital from March 2007 to December 2018. The most significant drugs concerning the common skin symptoms and their significance to CADR were investigated by case-non-case and multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 266 drugs were involved in 858 cases of CADR. Among the ten most relevant medications, primarily antibiotics and herbal injections, and nutritional support drugs, potassium sodium dehydroandrographolide succinate injection, and cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium injection were found to be 2.1 and 1.45 times statistically more prone to CADRs than to other adverse drug reactions (ADRs), respectively. The main route of administration was intravenous (63.16%), with oral administration accounting for 25.19%. There were 747 cases of ADR, 71 of severe ADR, 2 of new and severe ADRs, and 38 cases of new ADR. Overall, 100 cases of CADR exhibited abnormal alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and serum creatinine levels. The predictive factors for severe CADR occurrence included allergy and smoking histories, cefoperazone sodium, sulbactam sodium injection, levofloxacin lactate and sodium chloride injection. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-induced CADR symptoms are commonly associated with other ARDs, predominantly rashes and pruritus, and are often accompanied by some medical conditions, especially liver and kidney damage. Detailed attention to a patient's primary diseases, allergy history, and drug safety profile could help prevent or reverse CADR in most patients.

Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (CADRs)-Statistical Analysis of the Causal Relationship between the Drug, Comorbidities, Cofactors, and the Cutaneous Reaction-A Single-Centered Study.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are among the most common types of drug hypersensitivity reactions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical spectrum of CADRs and to determine the causal relationship between drugs, comorbidities, cofactors or concomitant symptoms, and cutaneous reactions. A retrospective hospital-based study was carried out over a period of 10 years at the Department of Dermatology, Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Clinical Immunology at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn to record various CADRs, comorbidities, cofactors, and the suspected drug in hospitalized patients. The data were subjected to statistical analysis. CADRs were diagnosed in a total of 140 patients, 32.14% of whom were men and 67.86% of whom were women. The mean age was 66.33 years. The most commonly suspected drugs were Allopurinol 12.86%, Amoxicillin with clavulanic acid 10%, Amoxicillin 9.29%, Paracetamol 6.43%, Metronidazole 5%, and Carbamazepine 5%. Attention should be paid to the possibility of using a substitute for a suspected drug if CADRs arise, or discontinuing a drug that is unjustifiably overused. The results of the present study should also prompt research into a potential treatment that could be implemented concurrently with a drug that has a high predisposition to cause CADRs.

Cutaneous Toxicities Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Observational, Pharmacovigilance Study.

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are the most prevalent complication to arise from immunotherapy and cause significant morbidity. We aimed to determine the spectrum, timing, clinical features, and outcomes of cirAEs by conducting an observational pharmacovigilance study using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global database of individual case safety reports from over 130 member countries (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04898751). We compared adverse event reporting in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (91,323 adverse events) with those of the full reporting database (18,919,358 adverse events). There were 10,933 cases of cirAEs within 51 distinct dermatologic types, with 27 specific eruptions with disproportionate signal represented (information component [IC]025 > 0). Of these 27 eruptions, there were eight cirAEs with n > 100 reports, including vitiligo (IC025 = 4.87), bullous pemphigoid (IC025 = 4.08), lichenoid dermatitis (IC025 = 3.69), erythema multiforme (IC025 = 1.03), toxic epidermal necrolysis (IC025 = 0.95), Stevens‒Johnson syndrome (IC025 = 0.41), drug eruption (IC025 = 0.11), and eczematous dermatitis (IC025 = 0.11). There were differences in time to onset after immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation, with a median of approximately 1 month (erythema multiforme, Stevens‒Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis), 2 months (drug eruption and eczematous dermatitis), 4 months (lichenoid dermatitis), and 5‒6 months (bullous pemphigoid and vitiligo). CirAEs are diverse, dependent on cancer type, and have distinct and different onset times that are linked to the cirAE subtype.

Oral fixed drug eruption: Analyses of reported cases in the literature.

BACKGROUND: This analytic study aimed to summarize the data regarding OFDEs manifestations and characteristics available up to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched online databases for relevant articles and summarized their data regarding age, gender, Main drug classification and name, additional drugs, dosages, primary disorders, OFDE presentation and location, extra-oral presentation and location, follow-up, and treatment. RESULTS: The mean age of OFDE-affected patients was 38.9. Most of the reported cases were between 30 and 60 years of age. The female/male ratio was 1.12/1. Three drug classifications, which were mainly associated with OFDEs, were analgesics (27.8%), antibiotics (22.2%), and antifungals (11.1%). The most common additional drugs were oral contraceptives and corticosteroids. The three most prevalent disorders or conditions were infectious disease (23.7%), pain (13.2%) and auto-immune disease (10.5%). Erythematous lesions without blister (38.9%), lichenoid drug eruptions (16.7%), blisters/vesicles (13.9%) and ulcers (13.9%) were the most common manifestations of OFDEs. The rarest manifestation of OFDE was pigmentation. Lips, tongue, buccal mucosa, palate and gingiva were the sites in which OFDEs occurred in the included studies. Similar to OFDEs, erythematous lesions without blisters and lichenoid drug eruptions were the most prevalent extra-oral manifestations. The most common time for OFDE manifestations was one to three days after taking the drug. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the similarities between the reported cases of OFDEs, clinicians should familiarize themselves with OFDE cases in order to screen suspected patients effectively.

Investigation of Hypersensitivity Reactions in Carboplatin Desensitization Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Carboplatin is a key drug in the treatment of ovarian cancer, but hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) may occur with repeated use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven ovarian cancer patients treated with carboplatin desensitization therapy were reviewed retrospectively. The treatment completion rate and toxicity were examined. RESULTS: The carboplatin desensitization completion rate was 86.5%. Toxicity was Grade 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 17, 5, 10, and 5 patients, respectively. Erythema was the most frequent toxicity (36.8%), most commonly affecting the arm (23.5%). Furthermore, all HSRs were classified into: skin, respiratory, digestive, circulatory, and neurological. The completion rate of desensitization was significantly lower in patients with two or more target organs affected (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The main symptoms of HSRs, the most common sites of HSRs, and the criteria for discontinuing desensitization therapy identified in this study are useful information for the safe implementation of carboplatin desensitization therapy.

Epidemiology and risk factors for the development of cutaneous toxicities in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: A United States population-level analysis.

BACKGROUND: A variety of dermatoses have been reported in the growing number of patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the current understanding of cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cumulative incidence, distribution, and risk factors of cutaneous irAEs after ICI initiation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients in a national insurance claims database including cancer patients treated with ICIs and matched controls. RESULTS: The study included 8637 ICI patients and 8637 matched controls. The overall incidence of cutaneous irAEs was 25.1%, with a median onset time of 113 days. The ICI group had a significantly higher incidence of pruritus, mucositis, erythroderma, maculopapular eruption, vitiligo, lichen planus, bullous pemphigoid, Grover disease, rash, other nonspecific eruptions, and drug eruption or other nonspecific drug reaction. Patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma and those receiving combination therapy were at a higher risk of cutaneous irAEs. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design without access to patient chart data. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies cutaneous irAEs in a real-world clinical setting and highlights patient groups that are particularly at risk. The results can aid dermatologists at the bedside in the diagnosis of cutaneous irAEs and in formulating management recommendations to referring oncologists regarding the continuation of ICI therapy.

COVID-19 Vaccines and the Skin: The Landscape of Cutaneous Vaccine Reactions Worldwide.

In 2021, we entered a new phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. As mass vaccinations are underway and more vaccines are approved, it is important to recognize cutaneous adverse events. We review the dermatologic manifestations of COVID-19 vaccines as reported in clinical trial data and summarize additional observational reports of skin reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. Early-onset local injection reactions were the most common cutaneous side effects observed in clinical trials; delayed injection reactions were the most common cutaneous side effect reported outside of clinical trials. Understanding the landscape of cutaneous manifestations to COVID-19 vaccines is key to providing appropriate vaccine guidance.

Delayed Localized Hypersensitivity Reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine: A Case Series.

Importance: In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 2 mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) received emergency use authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2020. Some patients in the US have developed delayed localized cutaneous vaccine reactions that have been dubbed "COVID arm." Objective: To describe the course of localized cutaneous injection-site reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, subsequent reactions to the second vaccine dose, and to characterize the findings of histopathologic examination of the reaction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case series study was performed at Yale New Haven Hospital, a tertiary medical center in New Haven, Connecticut, with 16 patients referred with localized cutaneous injection-site reactions from January 20 through February 12, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: We collected each patient's demographic information, a brief relevant medical history, clinical course, and treatment (if any); and considered the findings of a histopathologic examination of 1 skin biopsy specimen. Results: Of 16 patients (median [range] age, 38 [25-89] years; 13 [81%] women), 14 patients self-identified as White and 2 as Asian. The delayed localized cutaneous reactions developed in a median (range) of 7 (2-12) days after receiving the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. These reactions occurred at or near the injection site and were described as pruritic, painful, and edematous pink plaques. None of the participants had received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Results of a skin biopsy specimen demonstrated a mild predominantly perivascular mixed infiltrate with lymphocytes and eosinophils, consistent with a dermal hypersensitivity reaction. Of participants who had a reaction to first vaccine dose (15 of 16 patients), most (11 patients) developed a similar localized injection-site reaction to the second vaccine dose; most (10 patients) also developed the second reaction sooner as compared with the first-dose reaction. Conclusions and Relevance: Clinical and histopathologic findings of this case series study indicate that the localized injection-site reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine are a delayed hypersensitivity reaction. These reactions may occur sooner after the second dose, but they are self-limited and not associated with serious vaccine adverse effects. In contrast to immediate hypersensitivity reactions (eg, anaphylaxis, urticaria), these delayed reactions (dubbed "COVID arm") are not a contraindication to subsequent vaccination.

Cutaneous reactions reported after Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination: A registry-based study of 414 cases.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous reactions after messenger RNA (mRNA)-based COVID-19 vaccines have been reported but are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morphology and timing of cutaneous reactions after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: A provider-facing registry-based study collected cases of cutaneous manifestations after COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: From December 2020 to February 2021, we recorded 414 cutaneous reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna (83%) and Pfizer (17%). Delayed large local reactions were most common, followed by local injection site reactions, urticarial eruptions, and morbilliform eruptions. Forty-three percent of patients with first-dose reactions experienced second-dose recurrence. Additional less common reactions included pernio/chilblains, cosmetic filler reactions, zoster, herpes simplex flares, and pityriasis rosea-like reactions. LIMITATIONS: Registry analysis does not measure incidence. Morphologic misclassification is possible. CONCLUSIONS: We report a spectrum of cutaneous reactions after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We observed some dermatologic reactions to Moderna and Pfizer vaccines that mimicked SARS-CoV-2 infection itself, such as pernio/chilblains. Most patients with first-dose reactions did not have a second-dose reaction and serious adverse events did not develop in any of the patients in the registry after the first or second dose. Our data support that cutaneous reactions to COVID-19 vaccination are generally minor and self-limited, and should not discourage vaccination.